About

Religious institutions that use government power in support of themselves and force their views on persons of other faiths or of no faiths, undermine all our civil rights. Moreoever, state support of an established religion tends to make the clergy unresponsive to their own people and leads to corruption within religion itself. Erecting the 'wall of separation of church and state', therefore is absulutely essential in a free society. President Thomas Jefferson.
“Erecting the wall of separation between church and state, therefore, is absolutely essential in a free society. ” President Thomas Jefferson.

Christians in this country of the United States keep insisting that the Founding Fathers founded this country on their religion, Christianity. Nothing could be further than the truth on that.

The Founding Fathers own words refute their assertions.

And any Christian who insists this country was founded on their religion? Or seek to force their religious beliefs into our laws, into our public schools, into our public square? Demanding that our country follow their Christian precepts and rules and laws? Are no better than the Muslim Taliban they scream against installing Muslim Sharia law here in the United States.

When Christians, who are complete and total hypocrites on the subject of abortion, when if they studied their bibles? They would see that their god not only commanded abortions to be done, but also committed abortions himself? And that historically? Christians have committed abortions against those they persecuted and did all they could in their forced conversion programs of Pagans, Native Americans, and many others? And that proof shows that in the United States 70% of women who get abortions call themselves Christianity? And these Christians demand such laws as if a doctor or a woman get an abortion they should actually be put to death? Proves their complete and total hypocrisy on the abortion issue.

Oh and just so you all know? Just because I am pro-choice? Does not mean I am also pro-abortion. I believe the hypocrisy of Christians on the subject of abortion should be exposed and stood up to. That Christians cannot have it both ways. They cannot deny the use of contraceptives which does in fact? Prevent unwanted pregnancies that leads to abortions. They cannot preach abstinence only to our kids in our public schools, because this has been shown to be a total failure and that our kids? Deserve to be taught the real truth and facts on sex education, including the use of contraceptives, the prevention of the spreading of stds, etc.

Another exposure of their hypocrisy on the abortion issue? All the while Christians are protesting against abortions, we do not see them doing the same about the over one hundred thousand Christian priests and pastors busted for raping children. Christians will stand up and defend all the hundreds of thousands of Christian priests and pastors who have been busted for raping children, offering all kinds of excuses, justifications and subterfuge to do so, and not demanding that those who do this to innocent children also be put to death? Then that also proves their complete and total hypocrisy on the subject of abortion.

Or when Christians scream against same sex marriage? Demanding even that lgbts be put to death according to the rules of their bible and Christianity? All the while seemingly forgetting all the prohibitions against adultery, and defend and support adulterous scum like Donald J Trump? And that the bible also calls for the death penalty for those who commit adultery? Again shows how these ChristoTalibans cherry pick their bible verses to defend their hate, their bigotry and their evil against lgbts, and how much a bunch of hypocrites they are. Because you cannot go around quoting the Old Testament teachings against homosexuality, demanding that lgbts be put to death according to those teachings, while then stating that since Jesus came? Those laws and rules were changed and we no longer have to put to death adulterers according to the rules of the Old Testament.

THIS IS WHEN THESE CHRISTIANS? THESE CHERRY PICKING, BUYBULL THUMPING, CHRISTOTALBAN HYPOCRITES PROVE? THEY ARE CHRISTIAN IN NAME ONLY AND THAT GIVES ME THE RIGHT? TO STAND UP TO THEM, EXPOSE THEM AND TRASH THEM. AND THIS? IS THE WHOLE PURPOSE OF THIS BLOG.

SO I CHALLENGE THESE KINDS OF CHRISTIANS TO DARE REFUTE ANY OF THESE WORDS OF THE FOUNDING FATHERS WHEN THEY CRY HOW THE FOUNDING FATHERS FOUNDED THIS COUNTRY ON THEIR RELIGION, WHEN THEIR VERY WORDS PROVED? THEY DID NOT.

“I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between church and State.” President Thomas Jefferson, 1802 letter to the Danbury Baptist Association, Connecticut

"The civil rights of none shall be abridged on account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any national religion be established, nor shall the full and equal rights of conscience be in any manner, or on any pretext, infringed." President James Madison in speech to Congress when introducing The Bill of Rights.
“The civil rights of none shall be abridged on account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any national religion be established, nor shall the full and equal rights of conscience be in any manner, or on any pretext, infringed.” President James Madison in speech to Congress when introducing The Bill of Rights.

Whilst we assert for ourselves a freedom to embrace, to profess and observe the Religion which we believe to be of divine origin, we cannot deny equal freedom to those whose minds have not yet yielded to the evidence which has convinced us. If this freedom be abused, it is an offense against God, not against man: To God, therefore, not to man, must an account of it be rendered.”

James Madison, according to Leonard W. Levy, Treason Against God: A History of the Offense of Blasphemy, New York: Schocken Books, 1981, p. xii.

"The United States IS NOT a Christian nation any more than it is a Jewish or a Mohameddan nation." President John Adams
“The United States IS NOT a Christian nation any more than it is a Jewish or a Mohameddan nation.” President John Adams

Treaty of Tripoli, Art. 11 .As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries. President John Adams.

"Whenever we read the obscene stories, the voluptuous debaucheries, the cruel and torturous executions, the unrelenting vindictiveness with which more than half the bible is filled, it would be more consistent that we call it the word of a demon than the word of god. It has served to corrupt and brutalize mankind." Thomas Paine The Age of Reason
“Whenever we read the obscene stories, the voluptuous debaucheries, the cruel and torturous executions, the unrelenting vindictiveness with which more than half the bible is filled, it would be more consistent that we call it the word of a demon than the word of god. It has served to corrupt and brutalize mankind.” Thomas Paine The Age of Reason

9 thoughts on “About”

  1. [In] the formation of the American governments . . . it will never be pretended that any persons employed in that service had interviews with the gods, or were in any degree under the influence of heaven. . . . These governments were contrived merely by the use of reason and the senses.” “A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America” (1787-1788)

    ohn Adams made it even more clear in his Treaty of Tripoli, article 11:
    Art. 11. As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.

    Thirteen governments [of the original states] thus founded on the natural authority of the people alone, without a pretence of miracle or mystery, and which are destined to spread over the northern part of that whole quarter of the globe, are a great point gained in favor of the rights of mankind. (John Adams, “A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America” [1787-1788]

    Let the human mind loose. It must be loose. It will be loose. Superstition and Dogmatism cannot confine it. (John Adams, letter to John Quincy Adams, November 13, 1816

    We think ourselves possessed, or, at least, we boast that we are so, of liberty of conscience on all subjects, and of the right of free inquiry and private judgment in all cases, and yet how far are we from these exalted privileges in fact! There exists, I believe, throughout the whole Christian world, a law which makes it blasphemy to deny or doubt the divine inspiration of all the books of the Old and New Testaments, from Genesis to Revelations. In most countries of Europe it is punished by fire at the stake, or the rack, or the wheel. In England itself it is punished by boring through the tongue with a red-hot poker. In America it is not better; even in our own Massachusetts, which I believe, upon the whole, is as temperate and moderate in religious zeal as most of the States, a law was made in the latter end of the last century, repealing the cruel punishments of the former laws, but substituting fine and imprisonment upon all those blasphemers upon any book of the Old Testament or New. Now, what free inquiry, when a writer must surely encounter the risk of fine or imprisonment for adducing any argument for investigating into the divine authority of those books? Who would run the risk of translating Dupuis? But I cannot enlarge upon this subject, though I have it much at heart. I think such laws a great embarrassment, great obstructions to the improvement of the human mind. Books that cannot bear examination, certainly ought not to be established as divine inspiration by penal laws. It is true, few persons appear desirous to put such laws in execution, and it is also true that some few persons are hardy enough to venture to depart from them. But as long as they continue in force as laws, the human mind must make an awkward and clumsy progress in its investigations. I wish they were repealed. The substance and essence of Christianity, as I understand it, is eternal and unchangeable, and will bear examination forever, but it has been mixed with extraneous ingredients, which I think will not bear examination, and they ought to be separated. Adieu. (John Adams, letter to Thomas Jefferson, January 23, 1825.

    Like

  2. I just handed your ass to you. Now? Let’s go on with what more of the Founding Fathers said shall we?

    George Washington
    “The government of the United States, is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion. The United States of America should have a foundation free from the influence of clergy.”

    Thomas Jefferson:
    “Christianity neither is, nor ever was, a part of the common law.”

    “Erecting the Wall of Separation between Church and State is absolutely essential in a free society.”

    “I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between church and State.”1802 letter to the Danbury Baptist Association, Connecticut

    Millions of innocent men, women, and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined, imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity. What has been the effect of coercion? To make one half the world fools and the other half hypocrites. To support roguery and error all over the earth. (Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia, 1782; from George Seldes, ed., The Great Quotations, Secaucus, New Jersey: Citadel Press, 1983, p. 363.)

    No man complains of his neighbor for ill management of his affairs, for an error in sowing his land, or marrying his daughter, for consuming his substance in taverns … in all these he has liberty; but if he does not frequent the church, or then conform in ceremonies, there is an immediate uproar. (Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia, 1782)

    “The legitimate powers of government,” he wrote, “extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.” (Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia, 1782)

    hake off all the fears of servile prejudices under which weak minds are servilely crouched. Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call to her tribunal for every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a god because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear. You will naturally examine first the religion of your own country. Read the bible then, as you would read Livy or Tacitus. The testimony of the writer weighs in their favor in one scale, and their not being against the laws of nature does not weigh against them. But those facts in the bible which contradict the laws of nature, must be examined with more care, and under a variety of faces. Here you must recur to the pretensions of the writer to inspiration from god. Examine upon what evidence his pretensions are founded, and whether that evidence is so strong as that it’s [sic] falshood [sic] would be more improbable than a change of the laws of nature in the case he relates…. Do not be frightened from this enquiry by any fear of it’s [sic] consequences. If it ends in a belief that there is no god, you will find incitements to virtue in the comfort and pleasantness you feel in it’s [sic] exercise, and the love of others which it will procure you. If you find reason to believe there is a god, a consciousness that you are acting under his eye, and that he approves you, will be a vast additional incitement. If that there be a future state, the hope of a happy existence in that increases the appetite to deserve it; if that Jesus was also a god, you will be comforted by a belief of his aid and love. In fine, I repeat that you must lay aside all prejudice on both sides, and neither believe nor reject any thing because any other person, or description of persons have rejected or believed it. Your own reason is the only oracle given you by heaven, and you are answerable not for the rightness but uprightness of the decision…. (Thomas Jefferson, letter to his young nephew Peter Carr, August 10, 1787.)

    I am for freedom of religion and against all maneuvers to bring about a legal ascendancy of one sect over another. (Thomas Jefferson, letter to Elbridge Gerry, January 26, 1799.)

    And let us reflect that, having banished from our land that religious intolerance under which mankind so long bled and suffered, we have yet gained little if we countenance a political intolerance as despotic, as wicked, and capable of as bitter and bloody persecutions. … error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it. … I deem the essential principles of our government . ..[:] Equal and exact justice to all men, of whatever state or persuasion, religious or political; … freedom of religion, freedom of the press, and freedom of person under the protection of the habeas corpus, and trial by juries impartially selected. (Thomas Jefferson, “First Inaugural Address,” March 4, 1801)

    James Madison
    “Strongly guarded as is the separation between Church and Government in the Constitution of the United States, the dangers of enroachment by Ecclesiastical bodies, may be illustrated by precedents already furnished in their short history.” in an undated essay (probably early 1800s) and an 1819 letter.

    Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprize [sic], every expanded prospect. (James Madison, in a letter to William Bradford, April 1, 1774)

    Congress, in voting a plan for the government of the Western territories, retained a clause setting aside one section in each township for the support of public schools, while striking out the provision reserving a section for the support of religion. Commented Madison: “How a regulation so unjust in itself, so foreign to the authority of Congress, and so hurtful to the sale of public land, and smelling so strongly of an antiquated bigotry, could have received the countenance of a committee is truly a matter of astonishment.”

    Here [in the Virginia statute for religious liberty] the separation between the authority of human laws, and the natural rights of Man excepted from the grant on which all authority is founded, is traced as distinctly as words can admit, and the limits to this authority established with as much solemnity as the forms of legislation can express. The law has the further advantage of having been the result of a formal appeal to the sense of the Community and a deliberate sanction of a vast majority, comprizing [sic] every sect of Christians in the State. This act is a true standard of Religious liberty; its principle the great barrier agst [against] usurpations on the rights of conscience. As long as it is respected & no longer, these will be safe. Every provision for them short of this principle, will be found to leave crevices, at least thro’ which bigotry may introduce persecution; a monster, that feeding & thriving on its own venom, gradually swells to a size and strength overwhelming all laws divine & human. (James Madison, “Monopolies. Perpetuities. Corporations. Ecclesiastical Endowments,

    And I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion & Govt will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together. (James Madison, letter to Edward Livingston, July 10, 1822

    Whilst we assert for ourselves a freedom to embrace, to profess and observe the Religion which we believe to be of divine origin, we cannot deny equal freedom to those whose minds have not yet yielded to the evidence which has convinced us. If this freedom be abused, it is an offense against God, not against man: To God, therefore, not to man, must an account of it be rendered. (James Madison, according to Leonard W. Levy, Treason Against God: A History of the Offense of Blasphemy, New York: Schocken Books, 1981, p. xii.)

    Late in his life [therefore in the 1830s?] he [Madison] wrote to his friend Robert Walsh with whom Madison conducted a steady correspondence: “It was the Universal opinion of the Century preceding the last, that Civil Government could not stand without the prop of a Religious establishment, and that the Christian religion itself, would perish if not supported by a legal provision for its Clergy. The experience of Virginia conspicuously corroborates the disproof of both opinions. The Civil Government, tho’ bereft of everything like an associated hierarchy, possesses the requisite stability and performs its functions with complete success; whilst the number, the industry, and the morality of the Priesthood, and the devotion of the people have been manifestly increased by the total separation of the Church from the State.”

    Like

  3. And now? Here are the real kickers.

    Thomas Jefferson starts out with his Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, where, the actual law of the statute says as follows: II. Be it enacted by the General Assembly, that no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods

    James Madison stated, when he introduced the Bill of Rights to Congress: “The civil rights of none shall be abridged on account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any national religion be established, nor shall the full and equal rights of conscious in any manner, or on any pretext, be infringed.”

    Like

  4. Ok Christo, YOU want to play? Let’s play.
    As far as I am concerned? Each and every time? A group of Christians? Get mowed down in a church by a psycho with a gun? I laugh and jump for joy over it.
    Every time a Muslim beheads one of you Christians? I throw a party.
    Every time a whole group of you Christians get wiped out in a natural disaster, especially in the good old redneck Buybull Belt? I throw a party on that too.
    Why?
    Because that is how Christians celebrated when they slaughtered a whole group of Native Americans, or Pagans or others.
    And? As you Christians have sown unto us Native Americans, and atheists? And lgbts, and Pagans and many others in your vile, evil, 1,700 year history of your brutal death and butchery cult of hypocrisy? So should you all reap back. And? I will never shed a tear for ANY Christian who is brutally murdered in a church or anywhere else. Cause you scumbags? Never shed a tear for all the people your fellow Christians murder now do ya? Matter of fact? You all deny it even happened.
    See what hearing and listening on a daily basis to all the hate, all the bigotry, all the misogyny and all the evil that is spewed out of ChristoTalibans well used outhouse pieholes on a daily basis? Yeah, you Christians? Sure do create haters, by teaching us how you all live by your hate.

    Like

  5. ALL YOUR CHRISTOFASCIST PASTORS OF HATE? From Walid and Theodore Shoebat, Charles Worley, Steven Anderson, Matt Barber, Scott Lively, Jim Bakker, Franklin Graham, Janet Porter, Pat Robertson, the Westboro Baptist crew, and ANY ChristoTaliban like them? Deserve? To be dragged out of their pulpits of hate? Put on their knees, and? Given a full frontal lobotomy with a 50 cal Desert Eagle. TO SAVE HUMANITY FROM THEIR CHRISTOTALIBAN INSANITY. I think if we put some of these ChristoTaliban Pastors of Hate to the same brutal deaths they demand for lgbts, atheists and others? You Christians will then? Get off your asses and do something about them. But I doubt it.

    ALL of your Christian priest and pastor pedophiles? All of your Christian leader Pedo PImps who protected them and moved them around to rape more kids like they were in a candy store?

    DESERVE TO BE PUT TO DEATH? USING YOUR CHRISTIAN TORTURE TOOLS OF YOUR INQUISITIONS.
    WE START? WITH SHOVING A RED HOT, COAL FILLED POPES PEAR UP THEIR ASSES AND SEE JUST HOW THEY LIKE IT.

    THEN? WE MOVE ONTO THE RAT TORTURE, WHERE WE STRIP THEM, BIND THEM TO A TABLE, PLACE A RAT ON THEIR JUNK, PLACE A CAGE OVER IT AND A BOWL OF COALS ON TOP OF THE CAGE AND LET THE RAT EAT THEIR JUNK OFF.

    THEY SURVIVE THAT? NEXT UP? THE JUDAS CHAIR, FOR ALL OF THEIR BEING JUDASES TO THE CHILDREN THEY RAPED OR ALLOWED TO BE RAPED. AND? IF THEY SURVIVE THAT?

    WE DRAW AND QUARTER THEM, CUT THEIR DAMN HEADS OFF AND PUT THEM ON PIKES IN FRONT OF THEIR CHURCHES WITH THE WARNING, THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS TO YOU SCUMBAG CHRISTIANS WHO RAPE OUR CHILDREN OR PROTECT THOSE WHO DO.

    WANNA BET WE DO THAT TO A FEW THOUSAND OF YOUR CHRISTIAN PEDOPHILES AND PEDO PIMPS? THEY WILL THEN GET THE HINT, CAUSE THEY DAMN SURE ARE NOT GETTING IT ANY OTHER WAY ARE THEY?

    Like

  6. So your daughter got raped by your pastor? Good. She probably wanted it and came onto him cause she is a typical Christian tramp and slut. You? More than likely? Took porn movies of it and jerked off while you watched and then? Took sloppy seconds.

    I am also betting? You dropped out of second grade homeschooling cause you got your teacher knocked up and had to marry her in a shotgun wedding didn’t you Spanky? Is that why your kids are all cross eyed mongoloids who cannot say a complete sentence? Cause you do the traditional white supremacist mental midget moron Christian habit of generational inbreeding.

    And? When you divorce your wife? Do you go back calling her mommy or sister? Inquiring minds want to know.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Create your website at WordPress.com
Get started